Why this guide exists
Most writing about collecting Shepard Fairey reads like a press release. You are told that he founded OBEY Giant, that he made the 2008 Obama “HOPE” image now held by the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery, and that his signed editions are “highly collectible.” All true, and all useless if you are standing in front of a listing trying to decide whether $450 is a fair price for a numbered screenprint.
This guide takes the opposite approach. It is built on 32,560 individual Shepard Fairey sales drawn from a consolidated comps database of 142,384 collectible transactions, filtered to Fairey, cleaned, and analyzed with the same robust statistics professional dealers use rather than the averages that mislead casual buyers.1 Every number below traces to a real sale. Where the data is thin or skewed, we say so.
The short version: the median Shepard Fairey sale in this dataset is $234.95, the middle 50% of the market sits between roughly $150 and $400, and the long right tail runs from there to a single, famous $46,000 result.2 But the median is the beginning of the conversation, not the end. The difference between a $135 print and a $1,750 print is not luck — it is numbering, format, edition size, venue, and the specific image. This guide quantifies each of those.
A note on what this is and is not. This is a description of historical secondary-market activity. It is not investment advice, an appraisal of any specific object, or a guarantee of future value. Art is an illiquid, taste-driven market, and past sales do not predict future prices. Read it as a map of where the market has been.3
How the data was built (and why robust statistics)
Before the numbers, the method — because a pricing guide is only as honest as its methodology.
Source. The underlying master database holds 142,384 collectible sales across 31 artists, aggregated from WorthPoint (about 80% of records), eBay (about 14%), and a long tail of higher-authority venues — MutualArt, StockX, 1stDibs, Heritage, Sotheby’s — making up the remaining ~6%.4 The Shepard Fairey cut isolates every record where the artist is Fairey: 37,140 raw records, narrowed to the 32,614 that survive the analytics floor, and 32,560 after removing scrape artifacts.5
The $90 floor. Sales under $90 are excluded from all analytics. In this database, sub-$90 “Fairey” listings are overwhelmingly stickers, postcards, mass-market reproductions, and wholesale lots — noise that would drag every median toward zero and tell you nothing about the collectible print market.6
Sentinel scrubbing. Prices of exactly 999, 9,999, and 99,999 are scrape placeholders for “price missing,” not real sales, and are removed before any median is computed.7
Robust statistics, not mean ± standard deviation. Art prices are log-normal: a handful of high-end results pull the arithmetic mean far above the typical sale. In this dataset the mean Fairey sale is $426.28 while the median is $234.95 — the mean is nearly double the median, which is exactly the distortion you would expect from a long-tailed market.8 Quoting the mean would systematically overstate what you should pay. Throughout this guide we lead with the median (the true center), the interquartile range or IQR (the middle 50%, p25 to p75), and the geometric mean ($268.69 here, the correct “average” for log-normal data).9 When we discuss appreciation, we use compound annual growth rate (CAGR) computed from yearly medians, and a momentum ratio comparing the most recent sale to the trailing-twelve-month median.10
The archive cross-reference. Fairey is one of the few street artists with a comprehensive public catalog: 2,236 prints documented on obeygiant.com. Each sale in the Fairey cut is matched against that archive by title-token overlap and year alignment, at a confidence threshold of 0.50, so that “Obey Star 2018” and “OBEY STAR (2018)” roll up to the same canonical piece.11 This is what lets us talk about per-piece medians rather than a featureless pile of “screenprints.”
With that established, the market.
The headline distribution
Across 32,560 cleaned sales, the Shepard Fairey secondary market looks like this:
| Statistic | Value |
|---|---|
| Median sale | $234.95 |
| Geometric mean | $268.69 |
| Arithmetic mean | $426.28 |
| 25th percentile (p25) | $149.99 |
| 75th percentile (p75) | $400.00 |
| 90th percentile (p90) | $799.00 |
| 99th percentile (p99) | $3,300.00 |
| Maximum | $46,000.00 |
Table 1 — Price distribution, all cleaned Fairey sales ≥ $90.12
Read this top to bottom and the shape of the market appears. Half of all Fairey sales fall below $235. A quarter happen under $150 — these are the open-edition prints, the smaller-format works, the well-circulated images with deep supply. The 75th percentile at $400 marks the upper edge of the “everyday” market: cross it and you are into scarcer images, larger formats, and hand-finished work. The 90th percentile at $799 is where serious collector pieces begin. The 99th percentile at $3,300 captures the genuinely scarce — large-format editions, early works, and high-demand collaborations. And then the lonely $46,000, which is not a print at all in the ordinary sense but an offset of the Obama “HOPE” image, the single most culturally significant object Fairey has produced.13
The gap between the geometric mean ($269) and the arithmetic mean ($426) is the entire lesson of this guide in one line. If a seller tells you “the average Fairey goes for over $400,” they are quoting the number inflated by the tail. The typical sale — the one you are most likely to actually transact — clusters around $235–$270.
A market that grew tenfold: volume by year
Pricing context is incomplete without liquidity. A median is only meaningful if enough sales support it, and the Fairey market has deepened dramatically over the period covered.
| Sale year | Sales recorded | Median price |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 10 | $197 |
| 2011 | 149 | $355 |
| 2013 | 789 | $249 |
| 2015 | 428 | $226 |
| 2018 | 2,610 | $220 |
| 2019 | 3,181 | $199 |
| 2021 | 4,816 | $230 |
| 2023 | 2,890 | $249 |
| 2025 | 4,959 | $250 |
Table 2 — Recorded sales volume and median by year.14
Two things stand out. First, liquidity exploded after 2017. Annual recorded sales jump from the hundreds into the thousands beginning in 2018, reflecting both Fairey’s rising cultural footprint and the maturation of online resale infrastructure. For a collector, deep liquidity is a feature: it means you can both buy and sell without waiting years for a counterparty, and it means medians like the ones in this guide rest on thousands of data points, not dozens.
Second, and more surprising, the median has been remarkably stable. Through a decade of explosive volume growth, the typical Fairey sale has oscillated in a tight band — roughly $200 to $300 — rather than spiking or collapsing.15 This is the signature of a healthy, broad collectible market: new supply (Fairey releases dozens of editions a year) is continuously absorbed by new demand, holding the center steady. The action — the appreciation and the risk — lives not in the median but in the dispersion around it, which is where the rest of this guide goes.
Across all years tracked, this dataset accounts for roughly $13.5 million in recorded Fairey secondary-market turnover, spread across 1,500 distinct catalogued pieces with enough sales to compute stable per-piece statistics.16
What actually drives the price
If the median is $235 but pieces range from $135 to $46,000, the obvious question is: what explains the spread? The data isolates several drivers.
Numbered vs. unnumbered: the single biggest lever
The clearest price signal in the entire dataset is whether a print is hand-numbered.
| Sales | Median | |
|---|---|---|
| Numbered | 24,537 | $300 |
| Not numbered | 8,023 | $135 |
Table 3 — Median by numbering status.17
Numbered prints sell at a median $300 versus $135 for unnumbered — a 2.2x premium. This is not subtle, and it is the first thing to check on any listing. A hand-numbered edition (e.g., “147/450”) signals a controlled, documented release; unnumbered material includes open editions, promotional prints, exhibition handouts, and the gray zone of “signed but not numbered” pieces that carry far less collector confidence. Note that essentially every sale in this cut is signed — the dataset is built around signed editions — so the numbering premium is measured on top of a signature, not instead of one.18
Format and medium
Medium matters, but format matters more.
| Medium | Sales | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Giclée | 42 | $387 |
| Painting | 443 | $300 |
| Screenprint | 12,310 | $250 |
| Print (general) | 16,553 | $230 |
| Letterpress | 1,065 | $199 |
| Lithograph | 1,213 | $165 |
| Poster | 391 | $165 |
Table 4 — Median by medium (selected, by volume).19
Screenprints — Fairey’s signature medium — command a $250 median, modestly above the catch-all “print” category and well above lithographs and posters. But the largest premiums in the dataset are not captured by medium at all; they are captured by format, specifically the “Large Format” editions, which we treat in depth in a companion guide. As a preview: the most valuable pieces by median price in this dataset are overwhelmingly large-format works, several clearing $1,300–$1,500.20
Where you buy: the authority-tier premium
The same image sells for different amounts depending on the venue’s authentication standard.
| Authority tier | Sales | Median |
|---|---|---|
| High (Heritage, Sotheby’s, MutualArt, 1stDibs) | 343 | $320 |
| Low (WorthPoint, eBay) | 32,217 | $231 |
Table 5 — Median by venue authority tier.21
Sales through high-authority venues run a median $320 versus $231 — roughly a 39% premium. Part of this is selection (better pieces flow to better houses), and part is the value buyers place on provenance and guaranteed authenticity. The practical takeaway cuts both ways: you will generally pay more at a major auction house, but you are also buying a documented chain of custody. On open marketplaces you can find the same image cheaper — if you are equipped to authenticate it yourself.22
The blue-chip core: the most-traded images
A handful of images form the liquid backbone of the Fairey market — the pieces that trade often enough that you can buy or sell one almost on demand, with a well-established price.
| Image | Sales | Median | p90 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warhol (2005, ed. 300) | 342 | $355 | $893 |
| Vote! (2008, ed. 350) | 209 | $233 | $450 |
| A Champion of Justice — Ruth Bader Ginsburg (2021, ed. 500) | 189 | $490 | $1,216 |
| Andre (1997, ed. 94) | 189 | $189 | $426 |
| Love Lotus (2021, ed. 550) | 186 | $160 | $582 |
| Knowledge + Action (2018, ed. 550) | 150 | $210 | $599 |
| Peace Guard 2 (2017, ed. 450) | 128 | $270 | $809 |
| John Lewis — Good Trouble (2020, ed. 550) | 119 | $325 | $650 |
Table 6 — Most-traded catalogued images, by sale count.23
These are the “index funds” of the Fairey market — high-volume, well-priced, easy to value. The Warhol portrait leads on raw turnover with 342 recorded sales and a $355 median, but notice the p90 of $893: even within a single high-volume image, condition, framing, and freshness produce a wide spread. A Champion of Justice (the RBG portrait) is the standout among recent works, carrying a $490 median — a reminder that politically and culturally resonant images, released into a motivated audience, can sustain prices well above the market median.24
The high end: scarcity, format, and the $46,000 outlier
At the top of the market, a different logic applies. Filtering to images with at least 15 recorded sales (so the figures are not flukes), the most valuable pieces by median are:
| Image | Sales | Median | p90 |
|---|---|---|---|
| KISS (1999, ed. 100) | 19 | $1,750 | $5,520 |
| Welcome Visitor Large Format | 18 | $1,500 | $1,999 |
| Golden Future Large Format | 27 | $1,390 | $1,902 |
| Ideal Power Large Format | 15 | $1,300 | $1,490 |
| Wrong Path Large Format | 19 | $1,265 | $2,440 |
| Marianne: L’action Vaut Plus Que Les Mots (2021, ed. 650) | 52 | $1,000 | $1,880 |
| God Save the Queen | 21 | $995 | $1,700 |
Table 7 — Highest-median catalogued images (minimum 15 sales).25
Three forces concentrate here. Age and scarcity: KISS (1999, edition of 100) is an early, tiny-edition work, and early Fairey is structurally scarce. Format: four of the top seven are explicitly “Large Format” editions, confirming that physical scale is one of the strongest price multipliers in his catalog.26 Cultural weight: Marianne, created in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, carries meaning that supports a $1,000 median across 52 sales — real depth at a high price.
And then the outlier that proves the rule: a single Obama “HOPE” offset sold for $46,000, the maximum in the entire dataset.27 It is the most reproduced political image of the 21st century, and an original-context example transcends the “print market” entirely. We mention it not as a buying target but as the ceiling that anchors collectors’ sense of the artist’s significance — and as a caution: one extraordinary result is not a market. The KISS p90 of $5,520 on just 19 sales tells you the high end is thin and volatile; transact there only with eyes open.
Momentum and appreciation: what is heating up, what is cooling
A median tells you today’s price. The more interesting question for a collector is direction. Using five-year CAGR computed from yearly medians (restricted to pieces with at least 25 recent sales, so the trend is real), the fastest-appreciating images in the dataset are:
| Image | Recent sales | 5y median | 5y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ozzy Farewell Tour (Red) (2025, ed. 450) | 53 | $275 | +95.2% |
| Muhammad Ali — Heavyweight Ideals (2023, ed. 500) | 57 | $288 | +48.4% |
| Bliss at the Cliff’s Edge (2024, ed. 550) | 34 | $150 | +45.0% |
| Love Lotus (2021, ed. 550) | 139 | $199 | +33.9% |
| Open Minds (2022, ed. 675) | 41 | $180 | +32.7% |
| Eyes Open (2020, ed. 625) | 57 | $199 | +29.6% |
Table 8 — Fastest five-year appreciation (≥25 recent sales).28
The Ozzy Farewell Tour print’s +95% CAGR is partly a release-timing effect — a 2025 music print riding an event-driven demand spike — and should be read with that caveat. But the broader pattern is instructive: music and tribute prints, and politically charged images, dominate the appreciation leaderboard. Love Lotus is the most credible entry: +33.9% CAGR across 139 sales is a deep, durable trend, not a blip.
Momentum — the most recent sale relative to the trailing-twelve-month median — flags pieces moving right now:
| Image | Recent sales | 12mo median | Last sale | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voting Rights Are Human Rights (2020, ed. 550) | 25 | $149 | $586 | 4.74x |
| Warhol (2005, ed. 300) | 193 | $450 | $1,850 | 4.64x |
| AR-15 Lily (2022, ed. 100) | 38 | $199 | $575 | 4.37x |
| Eyes Open (2020, ed. 625) | 57 | $199 | $586 | 3.25x |
| Love Lotus (2021, ed. 550) | 139 | $199 | $1,164 | 3.13x |
Table 9 — Strongest current momentum (≥25 recent sales).29
A momentum reading above ~1.1 means a piece is selling above its recent norm; readings above 3 mean a recent sale dramatically exceeded the trailing median, which usually signals either a genuinely scarce variant changing hands or a single motivated buyer. Treat high momentum as a flag to investigate, not a guarantee — a 4.7x reading on a $149 base is one strong sale, not a new floor.30
Markets move both ways, and honest pricing data shows the losers too. The weakest five-year trends in the dataset (again, ≥25 recent sales) include Mr. Spray (2004, −50.2%), War by Numbers letterpress (2024, −33.7%), and Rise Above Rose Geometric (2022, −33.1%).31 The lesson is not that these are “bad” prints — it is that supply, fashion, and over-issuance can erode price even for a blue-chip artist. Edition size, release cadence, and image fatigue matter.
Five blue-chip case studies
Aggregate tables describe the forest. Collecting happens tree by tree. Here are five of the most-traded images in the dataset, each read on its own terms.
Warhol (2005, edition of 300). The single most-traded Fairey image in this dataset — 342 recorded sales, a $355 median, and a p90 of $893.39 Fairey’s homage to Andy Warhol sits at the intersection of two collector audiences, which explains its extraordinary liquidity. But note the cooling trend: its five-year CAGR is −13.7%, even as recent momentum spiked to 4.64x on a single $1,850 sale.40 The reading: a deep, liquid, slightly softening market with occasional outsized results. You will rarely overpay because comparables are everywhere — but do not chase the momentum print.
A Champion of Justice — Ruth Bader Ginsburg (2021, edition of 500). The standout recent release: 189 sales at a $490 median, p90 $1,216, and a healthy +21.1% five-year CAGR.41 A culturally charged image released to a motivated audience, holding a price roughly double the artist-wide median. This is the template for a “modern blue chip” — high demand, controlled edition, durable price.
Andre (1997, edition of 94). A foundational early image with a tiny edition, yet a modest $189 median.42 This is the most instructive case in the dataset, because it breaks the naive “small edition = high price” rule. The explanation: “Andre” exists in many forms and reproductions, and the catalogued edition-of-94 sales mix with look-alikes and later printings in the open market. Lesson — edition size only commands a premium when scarcity is paired with clean, verifiable identity.
Vote! (2008, edition of 350). 209 sales, $233 median, p90 $450, +7.3% CAGR.43 A textbook “everyday blue chip”: priced almost exactly at the artist-wide median, deeply liquid, gently appreciating. If you want a recognizable Fairey at the market’s center of gravity, this is what that looks like.
Love Lotus (2021, edition of 550). 186 sales, but a low $160 median — and yet one of the strongest appreciation profiles in the entire dataset at +33.9% CAGR with 3.13x momentum.44 A larger edition keeps the entry price accessible, while rising demand drives a steep trend off a low base. For a collector, this is the most interesting quadrant: affordable, liquid, and climbing.
The edition-size signal: why smaller isn’t automatically pricier
It is tempting to treat edition size as a price dial — smaller edition, higher price. The data only partly cooperates. KISS (edition of 100) sits at a $1,750 median, and Andre (edition of 94) sits at $189, despite a nearly identical edition size.45 Two prints, comparable scarcity, a nine-fold price difference.
What separates them is demand and identity, not supply alone. KISS is an early, tightly controlled, cleanly catalogued music collaboration with a devoted audience. Andre is foundational but endlessly reproduced, so the open market floods with ambiguous examples and the verifiable edition-of-94 premium gets diluted by noise. Edition size, in other words, sets the ceiling on supply, but demand and clean provenance determine whether that ceiling translates into price.
The practical rule that survives the data: a small edition is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a premium. Pair a small, clearly documented edition with genuine demand (a sought-after image, a cultural moment, a collaboration) and you get the high-median pieces in Table 7. Pair a small edition with an over-reproduced or low-demand image and you get a $189 median. Always price the specific, verified piece — never the edition number in the abstract.46
The spread within a single image: condition, framing, and freshness
One number this guide returns to is the gap between an image’s median and its 90th percentile — because that gap is where condition, framing, and freshness live. Consider Peace Guard 2 (2017): a $270 median but an $809 p90 — the top decile sells for roughly three times the typical example.47 Make Art Not War shows an even wider spread: a $200 median against a $772 p90.48
Within a single image and edition, what explains a 3x in-image spread?
- Condition. Screenprints are fragile: handling dents, light-fade, foxing, and trimmed margins all cut value. A pristine, never-framed example sits near the p90; a sun-faded one with corner dings sits near or below the median.
- Framing and presentation. Museum-quality framing with UV glazing both protects the work and signals care to buyers; a cheap frame or a rolled, creased sheet does the opposite.
- Freshness to market. A print that has not traded in years, surfacing with strong provenance, draws competitive bidding. One that recirculates frequently invites buyers to wait for the next one.
- Documentation. A certificate of authenticity, a gallery receipt, or a clear provenance chain narrows buyer risk and lifts the realized price toward the top of the range.
The takeaway for buyers: the median is the price of an average example. If you are paying p90 money, demand p90 condition and documentation. And if you are selling, the difference between a careless listing and a well-photographed, well-documented, well-framed one is frequently the difference between the median and the p90 — a premium you capture simply by presenting the work properly.49
A decade in the life of the market
Step back from any single image and the macro story is one of maturation. In 2009, this dataset records just ten Fairey sales at a $197 median — a thin, illiquid, collector-only market. By 2013 volume crossed 750 sales a year; by 2019 it exceeded 3,000; by 2025 it approached 5,000.50 Across the full period, recorded turnover totals roughly $13.5 million.
What did not happen is as important as what did: the median never ran away or collapsed. It held in a $200–$300 band through a financial cycle, a pandemic-era collectibles boom, and the subsequent normalization.51 A market that can absorb a tenfold increase in volume without destabilizing its central price is, by definition, a deep and healthy one. For the collector, that depth is the quiet luxury underneath every table in this guide: you are not trying to value a thing that trades twice a decade. You are valuing a thing that trades thousands of times a year, which means the price you compute is the price you can actually transact at.
How to read a Fairey comp before you buy
Pulling the analysis together, here is the practical checklist this data supports. Before paying for any Shepard Fairey print:
- Confirm it is numbered, not merely signed. The numbering premium is 2.2x. An unnumbered “signed print” sits in a $135-median bracket; a numbered edition sits at $300.32
- Identify the exact image and edition, then pull its own median — not the artist-wide median. The $235 market median is nearly meaningless for a specific piece. Andre (ed. 94) sits at $189; A Champion of Justice at $490; KISS at $1,750. Price the image, not the artist.
- Check format. “Large Format” is one of the strongest multipliers in the catalog; several large-format editions clear $1,300+ medians while their standard counterparts sit far lower.33
- Adjust for venue. Expect to pay ~39% more at high-authority houses, and treat a too-cheap open-marketplace listing as a prompt to authenticate harder, not as a bargain to rush.34
- Look at direction, not just level. A piece with a positive multi-year CAGR and momentum near or above 1.0 is trading healthily; a piece down 30–50% over five years may keep sliding regardless of the artist’s profile.35
- Respect the thin top. Above the 90th percentile (~$800), sale counts drop and volatility rises. The data is thinner, single results swing the picture, and you need provenance and patience.
Do this and you are no longer guessing. You are pricing a Shepard Fairey print the way a dealer does — against thousands of real sales, with the median as your anchor and the spread as your map.
Methodology, caveats, and limitations
In the interest of the transparency this guide is built on:
- WorthPoint dominance. About 80% of the underlying records come from WorthPoint, which aggregates completed marketplace and auction listings. This is broad and deep but skews toward the retail/secondary segment; pure top-tier auction results are a small minority. Read the medians as reflecting the accessible market most collectors actually transact in, not the rarefied auction ceiling.36
- Signed-edition cut. This analysis is built around signed Fairey editions; it is not a statement about the unsigned-poster or open-edition market, which trades on different dynamics.
- Match confidence. Per-piece figures depend on correctly matching free-text sale titles to catalogued works at a 0.50 confidence threshold. The threshold was deliberately raised from 0.40 after the 40–49 band proved roughly 80% false positives on generic single-token matches; some residual mismatch remains in any title-based system.37
- Not advice. Every figure here is historical and descriptive. Nothing in this guide is an appraisal of a specific object, a prediction, or investment advice. Collectible markets are illiquid and taste-driven; buy what you love and can hold.38
Footnotes
Data current as of the comps workbook generated June 10, 2026. Gauntlet Gallery publishes pricing analysis for transparency; every figure above is drawn from recorded secondary-market sales. Browse authenticated Shepard Fairey editions at gauntlet.gallery, or see our Shepard Fairey Buyer’s Guide and how to spot a fake.
-
Figures derive from a consolidated comps workbook generated 2026-06-10 from a master sales database of 142,384 collectible records across 31 artists. The Shepard Fairey cut comprises 32,614 sales at or above the analytics floor; 32,560 remain after sentinel-price removal. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Sales sheet, all cleaned records ≥ $90, sentinel prices excluded. Median $234.95; maximum $46,000. ↩
-
Informational use only; not investment advice or an appraisal. See Methodology. ↩
-
Source distribution of the master database per workbook README: WorthPoint ~80%, eBay ~14%, MutualArt/StockX/1stDibs/ObeyGiant and major auction houses ~6%. ↩
-
README, “What each cut means”: Shepard Fairey defined as artist == “Shepard Fairey,” 37,140 raw records; cross-referenced to a 2,236-print obeygiant.com archive scrape. ↩
-
README, “Rules applied in every cut”: PRICE_FLOOR = $90; sub-floor sales are predominantly stickers/wholesale/reproductions. ↩
-
README: sentinel values 999 / 9,999 / 99,999 denote missing-price scrape artifacts and are excluded from medians. ↩
-
Computed from the Shepard Fairey Sales sheet: mean $426.28, median $234.95. ↩
-
README, “Why robust statistics”: median (central tendency), IQR = p75 − p25 (spread), MAD (robust scale), geo_mean (correct average for log-normal data). Geometric mean computed here at $268.69. ↩
-
README definitions: cagr_5y_pct from yearly medians; momentum_vs_12mo = last_sale ÷ median of trailing 12 months. ↩
-
README, match threshold 0.50, raised from 0.40 because the 40–49 confidence band was ~80% false positives. ↩
-
Table 1 percentiles from the Shepard Fairey Sales sheet: p25 $149.99, p75 $400.00, p90 $799.00, p99 $3,300.00. ↩
-
The $46,000 maximum corresponds to an Obama “HOPE” offset record in the dataset. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Year Rollup and Sales sheets, grouped by sale year. Counts are recorded sales in this dataset, not total market sales. ↩
-
Annual medians range roughly $197–$355 across 2009–2026, with most recent years clustered near $230–$300. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Year Rollup: summed recorded turnover ≈ $13.5M; per-piece Analytics sheet tracks 1,500 distinct pieces with sufficient sales for stable statistics (aggregate tracked piece-volume ≈ $9.72M). ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Sales sheet grouped by the “numbered” field: numbered n=24,537 median $300; not-numbered n=8,023 median $135. ↩
-
The “signed” field is True across the cleaned cut; the numbering premium is measured on already-signed material. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Sales sheet grouped by “medium” (selected categories by volume). ↩
-
See Table 7 and the companion guide on large-format and edition-size economics. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Sales sheet grouped by “authority_tier.” High tier defined (README) as Heritage/Sotheby’s/MutualArt/1stDibs; low as WorthPoint/eBay. ↩
-
High-tier median $320 vs low-tier $231 ≈ +38.5%. Premium reflects both selection and provenance value. ↩
-
Per-piece aggregation of the Shepard Fairey Sales sheet by canonical_title, ranked by sale count. ↩
-
“A Champion of Justice (Ruth Bader Ginsburg),” 189 sales, median $490, p90 $1,216. ↩
-
Per-piece medians, minimum 15 sales, ranked descending. From the Shepard Fairey Sales sheet by canonical_title. ↩
-
Four of the top seven highest-median pieces are designated “Large Format” editions. ↩
-
Single maximum record, $46,000, Obama “HOPE” offset. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Analytics sheet, cagr_5y_pct, filtered to n_5y ≥ 25, ranked descending. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Analytics sheet, momentum_vs_12mo, filtered to n_5y ≥ 25, ranked descending. ↩
-
Momentum > ~1.1 indicates a piece selling above its recent norm; very high readings on low medians often reflect a single motivated buyer. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Analytics sheet, lowest cagr_5y_pct with n_5y ≥ 25: Mr. Spray −50.2%; War by Numbers (letterpress) −33.7%; Rise Above Rose Geometric −33.1%. ↩
-
Per Table 3. ↩
-
Per Tables 4 and 7. ↩
-
Per Table 5. ↩
-
Per Tables 8 and 9. ↩
-
README source distribution; interpret medians as the accessible secondary market. ↩
-
README, match threshold rationale. ↩
-
Informational only; not financial or investment advice. ↩
-
“Warhol” (2005, ed. 300): 342 sales, median $355, p90 $893. Shepard Fairey Sales/Analytics sheets. ↩
-
“Warhol” Analytics: cagr_5y_pct −13.7%, momentum_vs_12mo 4.64 on a $1,850 last sale vs $450 trailing-12mo median. ↩
-
“A Champion of Justice (Ruth Bader Ginsburg)” (2021, ed. 500): 189 sales, median $490, p90 $1,216, cagr_5y_pct +21.1%. ↩
-
“Andre” (1997, ed. 94): 189 sales, median $189, p90 $426. ↩
-
“Vote!” (2008, ed. 350): 209 sales, median $233, p90 $450, cagr_5y_pct +7.3%. ↩
-
“Love Lotus” (2021, ed. 550): 186 sales, median $160; Analytics cagr_5y_pct +33.9%, momentum_vs_12mo 3.13. ↩
-
“KISS” (1999, ed. 100) median $1,750 vs “Andre” (1997, ed. 94) median $189 — comparable edition size, ~9x price difference. ↩
-
Interpretation: edition size caps supply; demand and verifiable identity determine realized price. ↩
-
“Peace Guard 2” (2017, ed. 450): median $270, p90 $809 — roughly 3x in-image spread. ↩
-
“Make Art Not War”: median $200, p90 $772. ↩
-
In-image spread (median→p90) reflects condition, framing, freshness, and documentation; presentation quality is a seller-controllable premium. ↩
-
Shepard Fairey Year Rollup: 2009 n=10 (median $197); 2013 n=789; 2019 n=3,181; 2025 n=4,959. ↩
-
Annual medians held within roughly $200–$300 across 2009–2026. ↩


